Drawing for HF STACKING CRADLE SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75531720

HF STACKING CRADLE SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HF STACKING CRADLE SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY1 LOGAN SQ FL 3PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006PREFABRICATED STEEL STORAGE UNITSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance