USPTO serial 75531773
XERIDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XERIDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PRISCILLA MARK
PRISCILLA MARK HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP275 MIDDLEFIELD RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SKIN CREAMS, GELS, AND LOTIONS, MOISTURIZERS, ANTI-WRINKLE PREPARATIONS, AND ANTI-AGING PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SKIN CREAMS, GELS, AND LOTIONS, DERMATOLOGICALS, AND TOPICAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellegy Pharmaceuticals
- Other trademarks owned by Cellegy Pharmaceuticals
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named XERIDIA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |