USPTO serial 75531874
ALEXANDER FOR MEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALEXANDER FOR MEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT F DELBRIDGE
ROBERT F DELBRIDGE GOWLING STRATHY & HENDERSONP O BOX 1045120 KING ST W STE 560HAMILTON, ON L8N 3R4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR GEL, HAIR RINSE, HAIR MOUSSE, HAIR THICKENING PRODUCTS, SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN CLEANSING CREAMS AND GELS, SKIN LOTIONS, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAMS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SKIN TONERS, SKIN EMOLLIENTS, SKIN MASKS, SHAVING CREAMS AND GELS, AFTERSHAVE GELS, BODY WASHES, BODY MOISTURIZER, EXFOLIATING SCRUBS, AND FOOT LOTIONS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, NAIL POLISH AND COLOGNE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |