USPTO serial 75531948
BEBOP DADDYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2727398Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEBOP DADDYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlington Heights, IL
Arlington Heights, IL
Arlington Heights, IL
Arlington Heights, IL
Arlington Heights, IL
Arlington Heights, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD B ROCKMAN
HOWARD B ROCKMAN SWEENEY & OHLSONPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely live music performances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 21, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kikeon, Steven M.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaye, Michael P.
- Other trademarks owned by Kikeon, Steven M.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaye, Michael P.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaye, Michael P.
- Other trademarks owned by Kikeon, Steven M.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BEBOP DADDYS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |