USPTO serial 75532750
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BETH M GOLDMAN
SUSAN K FLINT LEGAL DEPARTMENTPROVIDIAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION201 MSN ST 12TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | real estate brokerage services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |