USPTO serial 75532840
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pasadena, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP I. FRANKEL
PHILIP I FRANKEL BOND SCHOENECK & KING PLLC18TH FLONE LINCOLN CTRSYRACUSE, NY 13202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO TRAVEL VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 041 | ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO SHOWS AND OTHER ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 042 | ONLINE TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TEMPORARY LODGING VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |