Drawing for TICKETS.COM

USPTO serial 75532840

TICKETS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TICKETS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILIP I. FRANKEL

PHILIP I FRANKEL BOND SCHOENECK & KING PLLC18TH FLONE LINCOLN CTRSYRACUSE, NY 13202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO TRAVEL VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVEAug 1, 1997
041ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO SHOWS AND OTHER ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVEAug 1, 1997
042ONLINE TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TEMPORARY LODGING VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVEAug 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 11, 2003GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 17, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 1, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Mar 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 14, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance