USPTO serial 75532889
I.C.A.S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2000
- Examiner
- HUTTON JR, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I.C.A.S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
Liverpool, GB
Other trademarks owned by Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
Liverpool, GB
Other trademarks owned by Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
Liverpool, GB
Other trademarks owned by Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JASON A BERNSTEIN
JASON A BERNSTEIN BERNSTEIN & ASSOC PC30 PERIMETER CTR E STE 121ATLANTA, GA 30346-1902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COST ASSESSMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF LEGAL SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Costs Assessment Services Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named I.C.A.S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |