Drawing for AQUARIUM AN UNDERWATER DINING

USPTO serial 75532898

AQUARIUM AN UNDERWATER DINING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUARIUM AN UNDERWATER DINING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM D. RAMAN

WILLIAM D RAMAN THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1200 SAN JACINTO CTR98 SAN JACINTO BLVDAUSTIN, TX 78701-4081

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 17, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 17, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 2, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 8, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance