USPTO serial 75533103
SILENT ECHO PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILENT ECHO PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Marina Del Rey, CA
Marina Del Rey, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD H KIEL ESQ
GERALD H KIEL ESQ REED SMITH LLP599 LEXINGTON AVE 29TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF TELEVISION SHOW PRODUCTION, MOTION PICTURE FILM PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTION OF PLAYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |