Drawing for GLEGG REFERENCE DESIGN 2000

USPTO serial 75533228

GLEGG REFERENCE DESIGN 2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLEGG REFERENCE DESIGN 2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D MICHAEL BEAN

D MICHAEL BEAN GOWLING STRATHY & HENDERSON50 QUEEN ST N STE 1020KITCHENER, ON N2H 6M2CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011WATER PURIFICATION UNITS AND SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF CLARIFIERS, ELECTRO DEIONIZATION SYSTEMS, CONDENSATE POLISHERS, VACUUM DEGASIFICATION UNITS, ULTRA FILTRATION UNITS, ULTRAVIOLET STERILIZERS, ION EXCHANGERS, ACID AND CAUSTIC REGENERATION SYSTEMS, REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEMS, FORCED DRAFT DECARBONATOR UNITS, FILTERS, CHEMICAL FEED SYSTEMS AND BULK STORAGE UNITS, SOLD WITH AUTOMATIC CONTROLS AND INSTRUMENTS TO MONITOR OPERATING PARAMETERS OF THE UNITS AND SYSTEMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 6, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 6, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 28, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 30, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 30, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 3, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance