USPTO serial 75533229
REFERENCE DESIGN 2000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REFERENCE DESIGN 2000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D MICHAEL BEAN
D MICHAEL BEAN GOWLING STRATHY & HENDERSON50 QUEEN ST N STE 1020KITCHENER, ON N2H 6M2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WATER PURIFICATION UNITS AND SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF CLARIFIERS, ELECTRO DEIONIZATION SYSTEMS, CONDENSATE POLISHERS, VACUUM DEGASIFICATION UNITS, ULTRA FILTRATION UNITS, ULTRAVIOLET STERILIZERS, ION EXCHANGERS, ACID AND CAUSTIC REGENERATION SYSTEMS, REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEMS, FORCED DRAFT DECARBONATOR UNITS, FILTERS,CHEMICAL FEED SYSTEMS AND BULK STORAGE UNITS, SOLD WITH AUTOMATIC CONTROLS AND INSTRUMENTS TO MONITOR OPERATING PARAMETERS OF THE UNITS AND SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |