Drawing for EXPERT E & M

USPTO serial 75533249

EXPERT E & M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPERT E & M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MELANIE E HOMER

MELANIE E HOMER SUTIN THAYER & BROWNE PCP O BOX 1945ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT ORGANIZES AND RECORDS MEDICAL TREATMENTS FOR BILLING PURPOSES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL GUIDELINESACTIVE—
035COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENTACTIVE—
037COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, THE INSTALLATION OF THE COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY THE REPAIR OF THE COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance