USPTO serial 75533463
INTERNET BROADCASTING COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERNET BROADCASTING COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEAL L SLIFIN
NEAL L SLIFKIN ESQ HARRIS BEACH & WILCOX LLPTHE GRANITE BLDG130 E MAIN STROCHESTER, NY 14604-1687Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing information in the field of financial documents by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |