Drawing for CHICAGO MOTOR SPEEDWAY

USPTO serial 75533556

CHICAGO MOTOR SPEEDWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHICAGO MOTOR SPEEDWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD A ZACHAR

RICHARD A ZACHAR VEDDER PRICE KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE STSTE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1003

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Cigarette lighters of precious metalACTIVE—
016Posters, playing cards, paper party decorations, stationary, business cards, trading cards, calendars, books and magazines, namely, about motor sports, postcards, pens and pencils, bumper stickers, paper and fabric shopping bags, printed materials, namely, racing programs, ticketsACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, toy automobile models made of die case and plastic, windup toy vehicles, plush toy animals, board games and sporting goods, namely, baseballs, basketballs, golf balls and golf clubsACTIVE—
034Cigarette lighters not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 8, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2001OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 16, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 19, 2000OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance