USPTO serial 75533617
I-PLANNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I-PLANNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald V Thurman
RONALD V THURMAN MANAGER OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYFRANKLIN COVEY CO360 W 4800 NPROVO, UT 84604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING ON-LINE PERSONAL PLANNER AND ORGANIZER INFORMATION AND SCHEDULING MATERIALS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2000 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |