Drawing for CANINE COMPLETE

USPTO serial 75533640

CANINE COMPLETE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANINE COMPLETE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Van Dyke

DANIEL VAN DYKE VAN DYKE, GARDNERLINN & BURKHART, LLPP 0 BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031DOG FOODACTIVESep 29, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 28, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 12, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 12, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 7, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 3, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance