USPTO serial 75533640
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Van Dyke
DANIEL VAN DYKE VAN DYKE, GARDNERLINN & BURKHART, LLPP 0 BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | DOG FOOD | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |