Drawing for THE HARTFORD

USPTO serial 75533949

THE HARTFORD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2454212Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2001
Examiner
LAUTERBACH, JODI
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE HARTFORD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN R GARBER

TRADEMARK UNIT HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYCORPORATE LAW DEPTHARTFORD PLZHARTFORD, CT 06115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF INFORMATION DATA BASES FOR OTHERS; DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF INFORMATION DATA BASE SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS SYSTEMS AND RECOMMENDING APPROPRIATE COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THAT BUSINESSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 15, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2011CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 10, 2011CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 6, 2011CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 26, 2011CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 23, 20068.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
May 30, 20068.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
May 30, 2006ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2001R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 14, 2001CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance