USPTO serial 75534347
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest I. Gifford
ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE,PATMORE, ANDERSON, CITKOWSKI, PC280 N OLD WOODWARD, STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Infrared electrofusion welding machines for fusion joining of plastic pipes and fittings | ACTIVE | Jul 13, 1998 |
| 037 | Repair of plastic pipe ducts | ACTIVE | Jul 13, 1998 |
| 041 | Training in the use and operation of electrofusion welding machines | ACTIVE | Jul 13, 1998 |
| 042 | Technical consulting in the field of plastic fusion technology | ACTIVE | Jul 13, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |