Drawing for IR-63 PLUS

USPTO serial 75534347

IR-63 PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IR-63 PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest I. Gifford

ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE,PATMORE, ANDERSON, CITKOWSKI, PC280 N OLD WOODWARD, STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Infrared electrofusion welding machines for fusion joining of plastic pipes and fittingsACTIVEJul 13, 1998
037Repair of plastic pipe ductsACTIVEJul 13, 1998
041Training in the use and operation of electrofusion welding machinesACTIVEJul 13, 1998
042Technical consulting in the field of plastic fusion technologyACTIVEJul 13, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 14, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 27, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 13, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 19, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance