Drawing for ALL ABOUT BULBS

USPTO serial 75534383

ALL ABOUT BULBS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALL ABOUT BULBS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald T. Bodner

GERALD T BODNER BODNER & O'ROURKE, LLP425 BROADHOLLOW RD STE 108MELVILLE, NY 11747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF LIGHT BULBSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 23, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 2, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 29, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 5, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 28, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 18, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 25, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 17, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance