Drawing for Z-BILL PAYMENT SERVICES

USPTO serial 75534402

Z-BILL PAYMENT SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Z-BILL PAYMENT SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janice W. Housey

JANICE W HOUSEY PIPER & MARBURY LLP1200 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Electronic funds transfer, electronic payments, namely electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data, checking and savings account services and financial portfolio management, all via a global computer networkACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing local and long distance telephone services; providing electronic voice, voice mail, facsimile and data transmission, and electronic mail; providing telephonic routing services, namely activating call forwarding from telephone to telephone; providing communication connections for the transmission of voice, electronic mail and data by linking users via facsimiles and telephones and a global computer network; providing electronic data interchange services; receiving invoices, managing accounts and electronic fund transfer services, all via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 25, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 26, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance