Drawing for C.M. HUTSCHENREUTHER

USPTO serial 75534997

C.M. HUTSCHENREUTHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAJU, RADHIKA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with C.M. HUTSCHENREUTHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD M LABARGE

RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL O'TOOLE GERSTEIN MURRAY & BORUN6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008goods of porcelain, earthenware, glass and similar ceramic materials, namely household and kitchen utensils of porcelain as well as services made of porcelain, in particular dinner, coffee, tea, chocolate, mocha and breakfast services, consumer and decorative goods made of ceramic materials, namely plates, dishes, bowls, mugs, cups, pots, jugs, vessels for pouring liquids, cans, vases, epergnes, cutlery handles, honey dispensers, egg cups, napkin rings, napkin holders; decorative figurines made of porcelain, earthenware, glass and similar ceramic materials; ceramic artifacts for decorative purposes for household, kitchen and garden use; glassware and crystal glassware, namely drinking glasses, dishes, bowls, vases, jugs and napkin holdersACTIVE—
021goods of porcelain, earthenware, glass and similar ceramic materials, namely household and kitchen utensils of porcelain as well as services made of porcelain, in particular dinner, coffee, tea, chocolate, mocha and breakfast services, consumer and decorative goods made of ceramic materials, namely plates, dishes, bowls, mugs, cups, pots, jugs, vessels for pouring liquids, cans, vases, epergnes, cutlery handles, honey dispensers, egg cups, napkin rings, napkin holders; decorative figurines made of porcelain, earthenware, glass and similar ceramic materials; ceramic artifacts for decorative purposes for household, kitchen and garden use; glassware and crystal glassware, namely drinking glasses, dishes, bowls, vases, jugs and napkin holdersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance