USPTO serial 75535048
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JASON E. LAVENDER
JASON E LAVENDER FOLEY & LARDNERONE MARITIME PLZ 6TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services for others, namely, the dissemination of advertising via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing chat rooms via a global computer network for the transmission of messages among computer users in the field of games, hobbies, music, science, education, entertainment, news, and sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing computerized database via the global computer network in the field of music, science, education, entertainment, news, sports, hobbies, and games | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, designing and hosting of web pages for others, and providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |