USPTO serial 75535232
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman
JEFFREY C WHITLEY U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INC2727 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Rental services, namely, rental of trucks, trailers, vans, moving vans, automobiles, recreational vehicles, automobile freight trailers, ramps, hitches, pads, tow bars, dollies, carriers, hand trucks, camper jacks, moving equipment, canoes, boats, boat motors, boat trailers, vehicles, general storage services; warehouse and storage space rental services; warehouse storage services; rental of garage space; parking lot services; rental of parking spaces; cargo handling; cargo unloading; furniture moving services; delivery of goods by truck, car or van; moving van services; truck hauling; truck towing | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |