USPTO serial 75535276
SMART MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2724501Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2003
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bremen, OH
Bremen, OH
Bremen, OH
BREMEN, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank H. Foster
Frank H. Foster KREMBLAS & FOSTER7632 SLATE RIDGE BLVD.REYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Glass Fiber Filtration Media For Use In The Manufacture Of Filters For Collection Of Paint Overspray And Dust | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 16, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Fibers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Fibers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Fibers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERIOR FIBERS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named SMART MEDIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |