USPTO serial 75535439
NET EFFECT SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NET EFFECT SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSHUA D THOMAS
JOSHUA D THOMAS WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for communication in the nature of electronic commerce; computer software for enterprise management, business process management, customer support, technical support, electronic commerce or employee assistance; computer software for communications and business applications via electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, customer support for computer software in the fields of electronic commerce communications, enterprise management, business process management, customer support, technical support, electronic commerce or employee assistance, communications and business applications via electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 30, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |