USPTO serial 75535535
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES GMBH
8201 SCHAFFHAUSEN, CH
ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES GMBH
8201 SCHAFFHAUSEN, CH
Andersen Worldwide Societe Cooperative
1215 Geneva 15, CH
Other trademarks owned by Andersen Worldwide Societe Cooperative
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER AND MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE WITH THE FOLLOWING CAPABILITIES FOR USE IN THE TRADING OF ELECTRICITY BY INDEPENDENT ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND POWER EXCHANGES-- BIDDING, CONTRACT MANAGEMENT, METER DATA MANAGEMENT, CUSTOMER DATA MANAGEMENT, SETTLEMENTS, BILLING AND THE PUBLICATION OF MARKET TRADING AND PRICING INFORMATION, WHICH IS ACCESSED FROM A WEB SITE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |