USPTO serial 75535800
TROVAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TROVAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Douglas, Isle of Man IM99 1T, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM E LEVIN
WILLIAM E LEVIN LEVIN & HAWES LLP384 FRST AVE STE 13LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, anti-parasites, vaccines, antibiotic ointments, hormones and gelatin capsules sold empty for pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |