Drawing for FIGJAM

USPTO serial 75536350

FIGJAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIGJAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack

DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT ST 42ND FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-2703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Health and beauty aids, namely, skin and body masks; skin and body lotions; body and bath oils; scented body sprays; essential bath oils for personal use; and suncare products, namely, after-sun lotions; patches containing sun screen and sun block for use on the skin; sun block preparations; sun block; sun creams; sun screen preparations; sun screen; sun tan gel; sun tan lotion and sun tan oilACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, men's, women's, children's and infants' shirts, jackets, sweaters, pants, shorts, sweatpants, headwear and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 22, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 30, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance