USPTO serial 75536451
PREFERRED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREFERRED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce J. Goldner
BRUCE J GOLDNER SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP913 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, AIRLINE PASSENGER SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF A FREQUENT FLIER PROGRAM HAVING AN ELITE TIER OFFERING A BONUS PROGRAM FOR FREQUENT AIR TRAVELERS, NAMELY, PRIORITY BOARDING, CHECK-IN, SEATING AND RESERVATION SERVICES; TICKET UPGRADES; AUGMENTED FREQUENT FLIER MILEAGE | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |