USPTO serial 75537351
I'M A DO'ER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I'M A DO'ER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Algonquin, IL
Algonquin, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHRYN GARIPAY
KATHRYN GARIPAY OLSON & HIERL, LTD20 N WACKER DR 36TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PHYSICAL FITNESS INSTRUCTION FEATURING ABDOMINAL AND MIDSECTION AEROBICS AND/OR EXERCISES TO DEVELOP THE ABDOMINAL MUSCLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |