USPTO serial 75538771
CHARLES AMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2587039Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2002
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHARLES AMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meats and processed foods, namely, cooked meat products, namely, stew beef and baked ham; prepared or cooked dishes based on meat or sea products, namely, meat loaf, stuff pork chops, clam chowder and stemmed oysters; meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces; eggs; milk and milk products, namely, yogurt, yogurt based beverages, and cottage cheese; and edible oils and fats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ETABLISSEMENTS AMAND S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ETABLISSEMENTS AMAND S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ETABLISSEMENTS AMAND S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named CHARLES AMAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |