USPTO serial 75538973
PLANET ELECTRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLANET ELECTRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN G CHUPA
JOHN G CHUPA LAW OFFICES OF JOHN G CHUPA & ASSOCS PC28535 ORCH LK RD STE 50FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF AN ELECTRIC LAND VEHICLE PROPULSION SYSTEM AND SYSTEM COMPONENTS COMPRISING A BATTERY PACK, A CONTROLLER FOR PROVIDING CONTROLLED ENERGY OUTPUT FROM THE BATTERY PACK IN RESPONSE TO USER INPUT, A DRIVE MOTOR, AND A GEAR SYSTEM; PORTABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS AND SYSTEM COMPONENTS IN THE FORM OF A BATTERY PACK, A CONTROLLER FOR PROVIDING CONTROLLED ENERGY OUTPUT FROM THE BATTERY PACK IN RESPONSE TO USER INPUT, AND BATTERY CHARGER | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1996 |
| 012 | ELECTRICALLY-POWERED LAND VEHICLES IN THE FORM OF GOLF CARTS AND PERSONAL RECREATION CARTS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |