USPTO serial 75539741
SITECALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SITECALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, and manuals sold as a unit, for broadcasting, transmission, reception, encoding, or decoding of video, audio or multimedia data by means of electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | video broadcasting services; audio broadcasting services; audio teleconferencing services; video teleconferencing services; all in the nature of hosting electronic forums and providing electronic conferencing for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | computer education training services; development and dissemination of educational materials for others, education and instruction, conducting workshops and seminars, all in the fields of development, design, hosting, management, updating, testing or tracking of web sites or sites on electronic communications networks; providing incentives to people or organizations to demonstrate excellence in the fields of the development, design, hosting, management, updating, testing or tracking of web sites or sites on electronic communications networks through the issuance of awards or certification | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |