USPTO serial 75539839
A&K KILIMANJARO SAFARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A&K KILIMANJARO SAFARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abercrombie & Kent Group of Companies, S.A.
Postfach 154, LI
Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie & Kent Group of Companies, S.A.
Abercrombie & Kent Group Holdings, S.A.
FL-9490 Vaduz, LI
Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie & Kent Group Holdings, S.A.
Abercrombie & Kent Group Holdings, S.A.
FL-9490 Vaduz, LI
Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie & Kent Group Holdings, S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas P. Arden
THOMAS P ARDEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLC131 S DEARBORN 30TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; transport by boat, air, railway, and barge; conducting sightseeing tours for others; arranging travel tours | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie & Kent Group of Companies, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie & Kent Group Holdings, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie & Kent Group Holdings, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named A&K KILIMANJARO SAFARIS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |