Drawing for NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL

USPTO serial 75539963

NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016legal newspaper published five times a weekACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 1, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 21, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 28, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 8, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 7, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 9, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 3, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 17, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance