Drawing for KITCHEN PHONE

USPTO serial 75540707

KITCHEN PHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KITCHEN PHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES M DURLACHER

JAMES M DURLACHER BANK ONE CTR TWRWOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY & MC111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telephonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 25, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 14, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance