USPTO serial 75540718
CCR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2809631Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CCR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CAISSE CENTRALE DE REASSURANCE
75008 PARIS, FR
CAISSE CENTRALE DE REASSURANCE
75008 PARIS, FR
CAISSE CENTRALE DE REASSURANCE
75008 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander S. Perry
Alexander S. Perry DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | REINSURANCE [ AND EXCEPTIONAL RISKS INSURANCE ] UNDERWRITING [ IN THE FIELD OF NATURAL DISASTERS INSURANCE, WAR AND STRIKE RISKS INSURANCE, POLITICAL RISKS INSURANCE, NUCLEAR RISKS INSURANCE, MARINE AVIATION AND SPACE INSURANCE ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAISSE CENTRALE DE REASSURANCE
- Other trademarks owned by CAISSE CENTRALE DE REASSURANCE
- Other trademarks owned by CAISSE CENTRALE DE REASSURANCE
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CCR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 30, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 19, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |