USPTO serial 75543209
THE BORGATA RESORT & CASINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BORGATA RESORT & CASINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen Gallagher-Duff
KATHLEEN GALLAGHER-DUFF COVINGTON & BURLING1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2494UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Beverageware; mugs; cups; plates; cookie jars; insulated cups; vases; coasters; bottle openers; cork screws; hair brushes; glassware, namely, shot glasses, drinking glasses and wine glasses; drinking steins; serving trays not of precious metals; hot water bottles; insulated bottles sold empty; thermal insulated wraps for cans or bottles to keep the contents cold or hot; non-metal decorative boxes; statues made of china and crystal; hair combs; non-metal piggy banks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marina District Development Company
- Other trademarks owned by Marina District Development Company
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named THE BORGATA RESORT & CASINO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |