USPTO serial 75543395
POWER CANADIAN FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER CANADIAN FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGEMENT OF MUTUAL FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named POWER CANADIAN FUND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |