USPTO serial 75543976
RE D'ITALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLLAND-CHATMAN, JAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RE D'ITALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cory M. Amron
CORY M AMRON VORYS SATER SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1828 L ST11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | soups, cheese, olive oil, processed olives, antipasto salad and deli meats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | pizza, pizza sauce, pizza kits comprised primarily of pizza shells with smaller portions of other side items, namely, cheese, tomato based and non-tomato based pasta sauces, prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice, bread, bread sticks, bread crumbs, croutons, salsa, dipping sauces, cooking and baking sauces, salad dressing, gourmet salad dressing, vinegars and desserts, namely, pastries, pies, wafers, sorbet and ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |