Drawing for ROUTE 66 AND DESIGN

USPTO serial 75544883

ROUTE 66 AND DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3374634Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2008
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROUTE 66 AND DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James B. Muskal

Route 66, Inc.9800 W. Milwaukee AveDesPlaines, IL 60016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018HANDBAGS, LUGGAGE, BACKPACKS, FANNY PACKS, LEATHER POUCHES, WALLETS, COIN PURSES, SHOULDER BAGS, TOTE BAGS, KEY CASES, KEY FOBS OF LEATHER, LEATHER IDENTIFICATION TAGS AND SADDLE BAGSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDOct 1, 1990
025MEN'S AND WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, COATS, JACKETS, PARKAS, SHIRTS, CAPS, HATS, PANTS, SKIRTS, SHORTS, VESTS, GLOVES, BELTS, SWEATERS, SCARVES, HEADWEAR, HEADBANDS, EARMUFFS, SUSPENDERS, BODY SUITS, WRIST BANDS, AND SNOWMOBILE SUITS MADE FROM LEATHER; WOVEN ARAMID FIBER LAYERED, LINED AND COVERED LEATHER GARMENTS, INCLUDING COATS, PANTS, VESTS, JACKETS AND HATSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDOct 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2009C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 15, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 8, 2009CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 29, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance