USPTO serial 75545039
UDUPI PALACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2001
- Examiner
- DICKINSON, RODNEY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UDUPI PALACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PARVEEN K GOYAL
PARVEEN K GOYAL PARVEEN K GOYAL LTD1080 NERGE RD STE 201ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL 60007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services, namely, an Indian restaurant providing food and drink including vegetarian South Indian cuisines; catering for all occasions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 25, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAHARAJA RESTAURANT CATERERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UDUPI PALACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |