USPTO serial 75545084
SENTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID V. RADACK
DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT STFORTY-SECOND FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL WIRE FENCING; MANHOLE LIFTS AND GUARDS MADE OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, NAMELY, EMERGENCY WARNING LIGHTS AND HIGHWAY AND STREET TRAFFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY CONES, DRUMS, COLLARS, VESTS, FLAGS, PADDLES, PENNANTS AND SIGNS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 017 | RUBBER BUMPERS FOR LOADING DOCKS AND REFLECTIVE TAPE AND SHEETING FOR USE IN SAFETY APPLICATIONS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 019 | NON-METAL BARRIER FENCING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |