Drawing for K.C. PARKER

USPTO serial 75545374

K.C. PARKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with K.C. PARKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Bonini, Jr.

DAVID E DOUGHERTY LOWE HAUPTMAN BERNER LLP1700 DIAGONAL RD STE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, including necklaces, earrings and braceletsACTIVEJan 1, 1993
018handbags and pursesACTIVEJan 1, 1993
025clothing, including hats and scarvesACTIVEJan 1, 1993
028figurines, including doll house furnishings and accessoriesACTIVEJan 1, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1999NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Oct 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance