Drawing for PANTHERVISION

USPTO serial 75545962

PANTHERVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PANTHERVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARNOLD B. SILVERMAN

ARNOLD B SILVERMAN ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT ST STE 44PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-2703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely T-shirts, golf shirts, hats, caps, jackets, coats, warmup suits, shorts, sweaters and rainwearACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, conducting intercollegiate and intracollegiate sports exhibitions, competitions and games and live presentations featuring previously recorded intercollegiate and intracollegiate sports exhibitions, competitions and gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance