USPTO serial 75546079
MEDPROMPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEDPROMPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul M. Vargo
PAUL M VARGO ROCKEY, MILNAMOW & KATZ, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ180 N STETSON, STE 4700CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | medical information services, namely, paging individuals and informing them regarding medication dosage and frequency | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 20, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |