USPTO serial 75546113
UNICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert H. Socolov,
ALBERT H SOCOLOV299 BROADWAY # 605NEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROSCOPES AND LABORATORY EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2000 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |