USPTO serial 75546159
SUPER ENC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER ENC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. MENKER
JAMES R MENKER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP1600 TYSONS BLVDMCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Encoders, image data compressors, MPEG-2 encoders, real-time encoders, video encoders, video compressors, video archivers; video encoder LSI (Large Scale Integrated circuit), image data compression LSI (Large Scale Integrated circuit), MPEG-2 encoder LSI (Large Scale Integrated circuit) , real-time encoder LSI (Large Scale Integrated circuit), video encoder LSI (Large Scale Integrated circuit) , video compression LSI (Large Scale Integrated circuit), video archiver LSI (Large Scale Integrated circuit); single-chip encoders, multi-chip encoders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |