USPTO serial 75546449
TIKES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2000
- Examiner
- ROSAYA, LISA W.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIKES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ormond Beach, FL
Ormond Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley N. Ruben
BRADLEY N RUBEN HOPGOOD, CALIMAFDE, KALIL & JUDLOWE60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optical goods, namely sunglasses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |