USPTO serial 75546451
VIATRIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIATRIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-7051 BASEL, CH
D-60314 FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
D-60314 FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
ROTKREUZSTIFTUNG ZENTRALLABORATORIUM BLUTSPENDEDIENTST SRK
Postfach 3000, Bem 22, CH
Other trademarks owned by ROTKREUZSTIFTUNG ZENTRALLABORATORIUM BLUTSPENDEDIENTST SRK
ROTKREUZSTIFTUNG ZENTRALLABORATORIUM BLUTSPENDEDIENTST SRK
Postfach 3000, Bem 22, CH
Other trademarks owned by ROTKREUZSTIFTUNG ZENTRALLABORATORIUM BLUTSPENDEDIENTST SRK
BAD HOMBURG, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott D. Woldow
SCOTT D WOLDOW SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NWSuite 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING MEDICAL HYGIENIC CARE FOR HUMAN BEINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHMID, STEFAN
- Other trademarks owned by VIATRIS GMBHH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by ASTA MEDICA AG
- Other trademarks owned by ROTKREUZSTIFTUNG ZENTRALLABORATORIUM BLUTSPENDEDIENTST SRK
- Other trademarks owned by ROTKREUZSTIFTUNG ZENTRALLABORATORIUM BLUTSPENDEDIENTST SRK
- Other trademarks owned by MEDA PHARMA GMBH & CO KG
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIATRIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |